Re: Pgtheme: PostgreSQL theme for drupal 5.x and 6.x

psql.it team, the italian developer postgresql community, has proud to
announce that the first realease of Pgtheme for drupal 5.x and 6.x is
ready.

Pg-theme has been used on www.psql.it website and now is a pgfoundry
project for the postgresql community.You can see it at
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgtheme/

Best Regards
Enrico

--
Enrico Pirozzi
www.enricopirozzi.info
info(at)enricopirozzi(dot)info
Skype sscotty71

Enrico Pirozzi a écrit :
> psql.it team, the italian developer postgresql community, has proud to
> announce that the first realease of Pgtheme for drupal 5.x and 6.x is
> ready.
>
> Pg-theme has been used on www.psql.it website and now is a pgfoundry
> project for the postgresql community.You can see it at
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgtheme/
>
>
> Best Regards
> Enrico
>
>
Thank you to share your (good) work with drupal theme.

PGfr users will aprouve the upgrade of drupal and take the pgtheme ;)

--
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Enrico Pirozzi wrote:
> psql.it team, the italian developer postgresql community, has proud
> to announce that the first realease of Pgtheme for drupal 5.x and
> 6.x is ready.

Why isn't this on -announce? :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Hello all,

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Enrico Pirozzi wrote:
> psql.it team, the italian developer postgresql community, has proud to
> announce that the first realease of Pgtheme for drupal 5.x and 6.x is
> ready.
>
> Pg-theme has been used on www.psql.it website and now is a pgfoundry
> project for the postgresql community.You can see it at
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgtheme/

some time ago we had a discussion about hosting websites for local
PostgreSQL user groups. If we provide some webspace, database and now
this nice looking theme: is someone interested in pushing local sites
for countries who don't have a established user group?

Bye bye

--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:56:40 +0100
"Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <ads(at)pgug(dot)de> wrote:

> some time ago we had a discussion about hosting websites for local
> PostgreSQL user groups. If we provide some webspace, database and now
> this nice looking theme: is someone interested in pushing local sites
> for countries who don't have a established user group?

Command Prompt would be more than happy to do this and I am sure the
general infrastructure would be willing to as well.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHl97sATb/zqfZUUQRAlxJAJ9MrxMFY9LSbWHIccsxCQkf9QqkbgCaAttI
9nFALJluKn2GUEJzWzUvbso=
=O+Wx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

We already have a website for local user groups to use JD - as you are
well aware (running Drupal iirc).

If we were to do anything Europe-specific though, we'll use one of the
boxes in France. Your general use boxes are already far to loaded for
my taste (in terms of machine load and service hosted).

On 1/24/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:56:40 +0100
> "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <ads(at)pgug(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > some time ago we had a discussion about hosting websites for local
> > PostgreSQL user groups. If we provide some webspace, database and now
> > this nice looking theme: is someone interested in pushing local sites
> > for countries who don't have a established user group?
>
> Command Prompt would be more than happy to do this and I am sure the
> general infrastructure would be willing to as well.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>
> - --
> The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHl97sATb/zqfZUUQRAlxJAJ9MrxMFY9LSbWHIccsxCQkf9QqkbgCaAttI
> 9nFALJluKn2GUEJzWzUvbso=
> =O+Wx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

On 24/01/2008, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> We already have a website for local user groups to use JD - as you are
> well aware (running Drupal iirc).
>
> If we were to do anything Europe-specific though, we'll use one of the
> boxes in France. Your general use boxes are already far to loaded for
> my taste (in terms of machine load and service hosted).

Gah, sorry - was reading the wrong graph. Scrub the machine load bit.

/D

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:16:04 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> We already have a website for local user groups to use JD - as you are
> well aware (running Drupal iirc).

I wasn't actually thinking about it as the pugs sites and we are farm
from having a website for local user groups at this point. The current
one is something that looks like it was put up by a 12 year old in 1997.

I will agree the new one will be better as it is based on Drupal but I
have a feeling it may take a little longer to get that up than we
expected.

>
> If we were to do anything Europe-specific though, we'll use one of the
> boxes in France. Your general use boxes are already far to loaded for
> my taste (in terms of machine load and service hosted).

Well I did say the general infrastructure would be willing, which I am
of course fine with. Your statement about our load is fortunately not
true. You can review the munin graphs yourself if you like.

Services hosted *shrug*, we have proven were good at it.

Joshua D. Drake

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:40:34 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> On 24/01/2008, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > We already have a website for local user groups to use JD - as you
> > are well aware (running Drupal iirc).
> >
> > If we were to do anything Europe-specific though, we'll use one of
> > the boxes in France. Your general use boxes are already far to
> > loaded for my taste (in terms of machine load and service hosted).
>
> Gah, sorry - was reading the wrong graph. Scrub the machine load bit.

Hah! See my response ;) (which was to read the graphs).

Joshua D. Drake

On Jan 24, 2008 3:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:16:04 +0000
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > We already have a website for local user groups to use JD - as you are
> > well aware (running Drupal iirc).
>
> I wasn't actually thinking about it as the pugs sites and we are farm
> from having a website for local user groups at this point. The current
> one is something that looks like it was put up by a 12 year old in 1997.

I won't comment on what's there, or how long it's going to take you to
fix it (though I assume it would be a similar amount of time as
provisioning a whole new site) - but it certainly is there for local
user groups - there's a bunch of them there already!

> I will agree the new one will be better as it is based on Drupal but I
> have a feeling it may take a little longer to get that up than we
> expected.

I thought the current one was Drupal, just an old version.

> Services hosted *shrug*, we have proven were good at it.

If you look at community01 (iirc), theres a bunch of distinctly
different services on it such as (Devrims?) mailserver, planetpg,
jabber, pgweb and more (from memory - I don't seem to have access any
more :-( ). Now I don't deny that they're all run well, but for a long
while now we've been provisioning distinct services on their own VMs
for security, ease of backup, upgrade, replacement, and moving (to
another host or data center) - it's a lesson we learned long ago, and
a way of operating that I'd rather not go back to.

/D

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:18:00 +0000
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> I won't comment on what's there, or how long it's going to take you to
> fix it (though I assume it would be a similar amount of time as
> provisioning a whole new site) - but it certainly is there for local
> user groups - there's a bunch of them there already!
>

Just so everyone understands, "I" am not the one fixing it. Selena is.
All I am doing is assisting her in infrastructure needs.

> > I will agree the new one will be better as it is based on Drupal
> > but I have a feeling it may take a little longer to get that up
> > than we expected.
>
> I thought the current one was Drupal, just an old version.

Old version of Word press (not that it matters).

>
> > Services hosted *shrug*, we have proven were good at it.
>
> If you look at community01 (iirc), theres a bunch of distinctly
> different services on it such as (Devrims?) mailserver, planetpg,
> jabber, pgweb and more (from memory - I don't seem to have access any
> more :-( ).

? You should... (have access that is)

> Now I don't deny that they're all run well, but for a long
> while now we've been provisioning distinct services on their own VMs
> for security, ease of backup, upgrade, replacement, and moving (to
> another host or data center) - it's a lesson we learned long ago, and
> a way of operating that I'd rather not go back to.

As someone who has been doing the whole web hosting business since your
only option was a 2400 modem I can tell you that the way we do it works
well. I am not arguing that the vm idea is invalid. In fact it is
something we are moving to but we are able to provision and rebuild (if
required) very quickly.

Anyway, I don't know why we are having this discussion. I am not
arguing one way or the other to host it at CMD. The France machines are
fine.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /D
>

- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHmLvkATb/zqfZUUQRAs4aAJ96D8zwSLpfMM+nT0AsPRogGvkkKwCgktT7
SdZ4yJuyLRlGDVeJgJ36/nI=
=mymx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----