Lists: | pgsql-general |
---|
From: | "Vyacheslav Kalinin" <vka(at)ipcb(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Polymorphic functions' weird behavior |
Date: | 2007-07-31 23:33:20 |
Message-ID: | web-4943026@buymin.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The fix is pretty easy if you need it now
Thanks for the update, Tom.
Another little issue with that function. I cannot make it
accept NULL as an argument. It won't normally accept NULL
reporting an appropriate error that it cannot determine
argument type, nor will it accept it if I make the
function STRICT, nor can I handle it inside the function
since it isn't actually called. Thus I always get the
error which is not desirable behavior. Any way around it?
regards, Viatcheslav
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Vyacheslav Kalinin" <vka(at)ipcb(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Polymorphic functions' weird behavior |
Date: | 2007-08-01 01:51:07 |
Message-ID: | 15600.1185933067@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Vyacheslav Kalinin" <vka(at)ipcb(dot)net> writes:
> Another little issue with that function. I cannot make it
> accept NULL as an argument.
You'd have to cast the NULL to some specific array type.
regards, tom lane
From: | Viatcheslav Kalinin <vka(at)ipcb(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Polymorphic functions' weird behavior |
Date: | 2007-08-01 12:20:34 |
Message-ID: | 46B07A92.9090002@ipcb.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> You'd have to cast the NULL to some specific array type.
>
> regards, tom lane
Unfortunately I can't do that (well, in fact it would be pretty
inconvenient) because the function is called from other plpgsql function
and I cannot be sure if it will be called with NULL or not. Anyway I
seem to resolved the problem by writing another doing-nothing-at-all
function with the same name and "unknown' argument type.
regards, Viatcheslav