Fate of pgsnmpd

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-06 19:12:39
Message-ID: 46169BA7.6070205@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed?
The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old.

greetings, Florian Pflug


From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-06 19:14:29
Message-ID: 46169C15.3020207@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed?
> The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old.

there seems to be quite a lot of work going on in the cvs tree:

http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pgsnmpd/pgsnmpd/

so i would guess it is still active though without an release for a while.

Stefan


From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-06 20:55:21
Message-ID: 4616B3B9.6030703@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed?
> The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old.

It is.
There is a team (Josh Tolley, me and Hiroshi Saito) working for RFC 1697
compliance. When that's done, there are some other additions in the
pipeline.

There's been a rewrite of several things since 0.1b1, and what we have
now is not ready for production use. But it will be :-)

//Magnus