Question to tea leaf readers

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Question to tea leaf readers
Date: 2004-11-26 10:55:18
Message-ID: 41A70B96.6060900@web.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We (pgAdmin Development Team) want to release pgAdmin III V1.2 real soon
now, we have the RC version out for a while. Very shortly after we
tagged our RC1 version, the pgsql catalog changed mostly unnoticed by
our core developers (including Dave Page and me), which rendered
pgadmin3RC1 nonfunctional for pgsql8.0beta5.

I wonder if anybody here suspects that some problem under current
investigation might lead to another last-minute catalog change,
corrupting our 8.0 support again.

I know trying to answer my question is speculation to some extent, but
if the tea leaves don't tell, maybe somebody can ask his magic crystal ball?

Regards,
Andreas


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question to tea leaf readers
Date: 2004-11-26 19:10:49
Message-ID: 10581.1101496249@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de> writes:
> I wonder if anybody here suspects that some problem under current
> investigation might lead to another last-minute catalog change,
> corrupting our 8.0 support again.

There aren't any open problems that might require a catalog change,
and I have my own (Red-Hat-related) reasons for not wanting to see
another initdb before 8.0 final. But there's no guarantee. If we
find a problem that can't reasonably be solved without a catalog
change, then there'll be one...

regards, tom lane