| Lists: | pgsql-general |
|---|
| From: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | exclusion in distributing binary-only postgresql to client |
| Date: | 2004-08-02 11:45:23 |
| Message-ID: | 410E2953.7000505@zara.6.isreserved.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
When I distribute a binary-only distribution of Postgre to a client, can
I exclude some parts of Postgres (to make it smaller), e.g.
documentation (all of doc/), some PL's, or even psql, initdb, pg_dump,
etc.?
--
dave
| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Garamond" <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: exclusion in distributing binary-only postgresql to |
| Date: | 2004-08-02 16:06:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1091462786.27166.26.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 05:45, David Garamond wrote:
> When I distribute a binary-only distribution of Postgre to a client, can
> I exclude some parts of Postgres (to make it smaller), e.g.
> documentation (all of doc/), some PL's, or even psql, initdb, pg_dump,
> etc.?
The general rule of thumb for PostgreSQL licensing is "as long as you
don't sue any of the pgsql folks, you can do what you want."