| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | unsupported platforms |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 05:30:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB46881.7040307@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I anyone going to email the people who last reported the unsupported
platforms to see if they'll re-test?
Shall I? Or should someone more official?
Chris
| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: unsupported platforms |
| Date: | 2003-11-14 07:51:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311140847550.17499-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> I anyone going to email the people who last reported the unsupported
> platforms to see if they'll re-test?
>
> Shall I? Or should someone more official?
From the latest list, all but the few odd NetBSD ports are known not to
work. And I've posted a request to test NetBSD on -general a week or so
ago. So I think we'd have heard something by now. But feel free to
solicit more people. Maybe writing to a NetBSD project mailing list would
work.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net