Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?

Lists: pgsql-sql
From: Ferenc Engard <engard(at)all(dot)hu>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pl/pgsql capabilities?
Date: 2002-06-30 23:43:29
Message-ID: 3D1F97A1.B4B25B32@all.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hi all,

A long time ago (at version 6.3.2 or what :) I have asked, but maybe
since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
(which can be of many rows) to the client?

Thank you:
Circum


From: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
To: Ferenc Engard <engard(at)all(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?
Date: 2002-07-01 14:40:47
Message-ID: 20020701144047.GB23653@cc.usu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 01:43:29AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A long time ago (at version 6.3.2 or what :) I have asked, but maybe
> since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
> return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
> example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
> perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
> (which can be of many rows) to the client?

As of PG 7.2 you can, by returning a cursor:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-cursors.html

-Roberto

--
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu/ USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+
Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net/
http://www.sdl.usu.edu/ - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer
I wonder if Singapore has any computer pirateers or hackers...


From: Ferenc Engard <engard(at)all(dot)hu>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?
Date: 2002-07-01 23:37:08
Message-ID: 3D20E7A4.436ED3FD@all.hu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

> > since it changed: can I use the procedural languages (any of them) to
> > return a table- (or view-) like output, just like in Interbase, for
> > example? E.g., if I have a metamodel and I want to write functions what
> > perform complex computations and queries, can they return the result
> > (which can be of many rows) to the client?
>
> As of PG 7.2 you can, by returning a cursor:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-cursors.html

If I understand well, I can create a cursor for a SELECT statement, and
return that cursor. Well, it is better than nothing, but I fear it is
not flexible enogh for me.

Here is an example from an interbase app. I have to declare that this is
not my program, and I do not know IB, so forgive me if I say silly
things...

CREATE PROCEDURE VIEW_1_1
(
SZEMPONTID INTEGER,
PARENT CHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
ELNEVEZESTIPUSID INTEGER,
RENDSZERKOD CHAR(16) CHARACTER SET WIN1250
)
RETURNS
(
CHILD VARCHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
GYERMEKDB INTEGER,
OSZTALYTIPUSID INTEGER,
NORMATIVNEV VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
TIPUSNEV VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
NORMATIVKOD VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
TIPUSKOD VARCHAR(30) CHARACTER SET WIN1250
)
AS
BEGIN
FOR
SELECT D1.CHILD, D2.TYPEID
FROM HIERARCHIA D1, OSZTALY D2
WHERE
D1.PARENT = :PARENT AND
D1.SZEMPONTID=:SZEMPONTID AND
D1.CHILD = D2.OSZTALYKOD
ORDER BY D1.SORREND
INTO :CHILD, :OSZTALYTIPUSID
DO
BEGIN
SELECT COUNT(CHILD) FROM HIERARCHIA WHERE PARENT = :CHILD AND
SZEMPONTID = :SZEMPONTID INTO :GYERMEKDB;
EXECUTE PROCEDURE VIEW_ELNEVEZES(:ELNEVEZESTIPUSID, :RENDSZERKOD,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, :CHILD, NULL)
RETURNING_VALUES :NORMATIVNEV, :TIPUSNEV, :NORMATIVKOD,
:RENDSZERKOD;
SUSPEND;
END
END

The point is not what this proc does (in summary, it gets all the childs
with their properties of a parent in a tree structure), but it cannot
gather all the information with just one select, e.g. it gets some data
from another (nontrivial) stored procedure.

As I see, that 'suspend' command gives back the actual row (and the
control) to the caller until it fetches the next row from this proc's
return value. Do I interpret correct that this stored proc returns a
cursor with structure described in the 'RETURNS' part, and which is not
linked to a SELECT statement?

Can I do something similar in PG? If not now, maybe in the (near)
future?

Thanks:
Circum


From: Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu>
To: Ferenc Engard <engard(at)all(dot)hu>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql capabilities?
Date: 2002-07-02 05:23:38
Message-ID: 20020702052338.GA28472@cc.usu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:37:08AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
>
> If I understand well, I can create a cursor for a SELECT statement, and
> return that cursor. Well, it is better than nothing, but I fear it is
> not flexible enogh for me.

Maybe not for the solution you have right now, but you most likely can
rework things a bit to make it work.

> Here is an example from an interbase app. I have to declare that this is
> not my program, and I do not know IB, so forgive me if I say silly
> things...
>
> CREATE PROCEDURE VIEW_1_1
> (
> SZEMPONTID INTEGER,
> PARENT CHAR(10) CHARACTER SET WIN1250,
> ELNEVEZESTIPUSID INTEGER,
> RENDSZERKOD CHAR(16) CHARACTER SET WIN1250
> )
...
> The point is not what this proc does (in summary, it gets all the childs
> with their properties of a parent in a tree structure), but it cannot
> gather all the information with just one select, e.g. it gets some data
> from another (nontrivial) stored procedure.
>
> As I see, that 'suspend' command gives back the actual row (and the
> control) to the caller until it fetches the next row from this proc's
> return value. Do I interpret correct that this stored proc returns a
> cursor with structure described in the 'RETURNS' part, and which is not
> linked to a SELECT statement?
>
> Can I do something similar in PG? If not now, maybe in the (near)
> future?

Not in the way you currently have, as far as I could understand it. I didn't
read the procedure very attentively because it's horribly written in all caps,
and my eyes started scrambling the letters half way through.

-Roberto

--
+----| http://fslc.usu.edu/ USU Free Software & GNU/Linux Club |------+
Roberto Mello - Computer Science, USU - http://www.brasileiro.net/
http://www.sdl.usu.edu/ - Space Dynamics Lab, Developer
"Data! I thought you were dead!" "No, Sir. I rebooted."