| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
|---|
| From: | "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pg Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | guc config_enum_entry add hidden field |
| Date: | 2008-05-27 18:29:51 |
| Message-ID: | 34d269d40805271129p1e310dc7k49435ba2a8300478@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am wondering if it's a good idea to hide the redundant entries
> to reduce clutter in the pg_settings display. (We could do this
> by adding a "hidden" boolean to struct config_enum_entry.)
> Thoughts?
The Attached patch does just that...
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| guc_config_enum_entry_hide.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.9 KB |
| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pg Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: guc config_enum_entry add hidden field |
| Date: | 2008-05-28 09:04:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20080528110414.4bb3219c@mha-laptop.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am wondering if it's a good idea to hide the redundant entries
> > to reduce clutter in the pg_settings display. (We could do this
> > by adding a "hidden" boolean to struct config_enum_entry.)
> > Thoughts?
>
> The Attached patch does just that...
Applied with some minor modifications.
//Magnus