| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
|---|
| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: status? |
| Date: | 2003-10-31 18:18:25 |
| Message-ID: | 303E00EBDD07B943924382E153890E5433F91A@cuthbert.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Did your initdb/signals patch get accepted or is that still an open
item?
Merlin
| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: status? |
| Date: | 2003-10-31 18:53:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3FA2AF98.7040901@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
>Did your initdb/signals patch get accepted or is that still an open
>item?
>
>Merlin
>
>
>
I have finished work on rewriting initdb in C - see
http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html . I guess Bruce will
merge it when he gets time (presumably after this release is wrapped up).
This wasn't so much a patch as a complete re-implementation from scratch
- signal handling was just a very small part of it.
But it can't really be thoroughly tested on W32 until we have a working
backend - I am assuming at that stage some tweaks will be required.
cheers
andrew
| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: status? |
| Date: | 2003-11-10 23:45:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200311102345.hAANjDc05127@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
I have applied the initdb in C from Andrew --- it is in CVS head now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> >Did your initdb/signals patch get accepted or is that still an open
> >item?
> >
> >Merlin
> >
> >
> >
> I have finished work on rewriting initdb in C - see
> http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html . I guess Bruce will
> merge it when he gets time (presumably after this release is wrapped up).
>
> This wasn't so much a patch as a complete re-implementation from scratch
> - signal handling was just a very small part of it.
>
> But it can't really be thoroughly tested on W32 until we have a working
> backend - I am assuming at that stage some tweaks will be required.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073