| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before |
| Date: | 2015-12-29 11:22:52 |
| Message-ID: | 2078494614.4473566.1451388172179.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Uninitialized variable 'dtype' warning in date_in() is fix[1] on branch 9.3 & above, but not for 9.2 & older branches. I guess this should be back-patch.
[1] commit link=> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5c45d2f87835ccd3ffac338845ec79cab1b31a11
Regards,
Amul Sul
| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before |
| Date: | 2015-12-29 11:42:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20151229114226.x33xobhuve443w6i@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2015-12-29 11:22:52 +0000, amul sul wrote:
> Uninitialized variable 'dtype' warning in date_in() is fix[1] on branch 9.3 & above, but not for 9.2 & older branches. I guess this should be back-patch.
> [1] commit link=> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5c45d2f87835ccd3ffac338845ec79cab1b31a11
We don't routinely backpatch warnings. Often enough the benefit is not
worth the risk. In this case I'd possibly gone the other way, but given
it's a low frequency warning in old branches I'm not inclined to do so
today.
Andres