Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 13:10:54 |
Message-ID: | 1403701854.24261.2.camel@asus-laptop-03.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
before we release 9.4.0.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 15:31:37 |
Message-ID: | 75622.1403710297@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
> before we release 9.4.0.
Probably, but I have no time for it right now.
FWIW, I believe the current "9.3" sources still work with HEAD/9.4.
regards, tom lane
From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 16:21:02 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+rDNAxm0SiuVj3FicomxZfOFL3wXy1iP4xYbZZ_e17wvA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> > Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
> > before we release 9.4.0.
>
> Probably, but I have no time for it right now.
>
> FWIW, I believe the current "9.3" sources still work with HEAD/9.4.
>
I'll check it and post the results.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 16:28:52 |
Message-ID: | 76091.1403713732@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
>>> Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
>>> before we release 9.4.0.
>> Probably, but I have no time for it right now.
>> FWIW, I believe the current "9.3" sources still work with HEAD/9.4.
> I'll check it and post the results.
I forgot to mention that thanks to Christoph Berg, the pg_filedump sources
have gotten off pgfoundry and onto git.postgresql.org. If anyone's got
bandwidth for working on it (in particular, merging the checksum-testing
code that was posted awhile back), I'd be happy to grant commit access.
regards, tom lane
From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 18:49:01 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+rEje-_yhqkxLpVhrZNaoVPUeK1fmpYTskZeQGSu=DvOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> =?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> >>> Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
> >>> before we release 9.4.0.
>
> >> Probably, but I have no time for it right now.
> >> FWIW, I believe the current "9.3" sources still work with HEAD/9.4.
>
> > I'll check it and post the results.
>
> I forgot to mention that thanks to Christoph Berg, the pg_filedump sources
> have gotten off pgfoundry and onto git.postgresql.org. If anyone's got
> bandwidth for working on it (in particular, merging the checksum-testing
> code that was posted awhile back), I'd be happy to grant commit access.
>
Merged...
I'm thinking in run "pgindent" to better organize the source code... What
do you think?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
checksum-testing_v1.patch | text/x-diff | 5.9 KB |
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 18:52:30 |
Message-ID: | 99289.1403722350@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm thinking in run "pgindent" to better organize the source code... What
> do you think?
Would like that, but I'm not sure what pgindent will do with the //
comments. It's been on my to-do list to switch all the comments to C89
style and then pgindent it, but I don't see myself getting to that in this
decade :-(
regards, tom lane
From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-06-25 19:14:18 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+oAb8h-0w2vLEWj6R-Gv=xizgdBya3K=SCd_9Tjyo=Zmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Would like that, but I'm not sure what pgindent will do with the //
> comments. It's been on my to-do list to switch all the comments to C89
> style and then pgindent it, but I don't see myself getting to that in this
> decade :-(
>
I changed all // comments to /* */ and run pgindent.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
checksum-testing_v2-pgindent.patch | text/x-diff | 105.3 KB |
From: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-08-31 10:01:11 |
Message-ID: | 20140831100110.GA10301@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-06-25 <CAFcNs+oAb8h-0w2vLEWj6R-Gv=xizgdBya3K=SCd_9Tjyo=Zmw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Would like that, but I'm not sure what pgindent will do with the //
> > comments. It's been on my to-do list to switch all the comments to C89
> > style and then pgindent it, but I don't see myself getting to that in this
> > decade :-(
> >
>
> I changed all // comments to /* */ and run pgindent.
I've pushed these patches to the git repository, thanks.
Christoph
--
cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/
From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-08-31 15:25:49 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+oJYr5j3fQmUYEJ1atmf8DCxmTL4HghnbxvZihffW-3UQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em domingo, 31 de agosto de 2014, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> escreveu:
> Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-06-25
> <CAFcNs+oAb8h-0w2vLEWj6R-Gv=xizgdBya3K=SCd_9Tjyo=Zmw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
> <javascript:;>>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > Would like that, but I'm not sure what pgindent will do with the //
> > > comments. It's been on my to-do list to switch all the comments to C89
> > > style and then pgindent it, but I don't see myself getting to that in
> this
> > > decade :-(
> > >
> >
> > I changed all // comments to /* */ and run pgindent.
>
> I've pushed these patches to the git repository, thanks.
>
>
Thanks!
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
From: | Stepan Rutz <stepan(dot)rutz(at)gmx(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump for 9.4? |
Date: | 2014-08-31 18:57:24 |
Message-ID: | 6E54DA49-76CE-4E97-8D83-FB246BF8811C@gmx.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi community,
while I am currently investigating why a certain table with highly redundant and utterly verbose xml becomes worse storage wise when making the xml more compact. Since i am quite new to this, I believe its the lz compression in the text database. But thats irrelevant now, just mentioning because tools like pg_filedump allow people like me to help themselves and a basic understanding of things.
During checking I noticed pg_filedump (current from git.postgresql.org incl. the below mentioned commit) does not compile on Mac-OSX. Afaik it will not compile as soon as post.h comes into play and USE_REPL_SNPRINTF is defined. Then printf and sprintf (ouch particular but code path seems tolerable) in the source of pg_filedump become pg_printf and so on. These replacements are part of postgres and can’t be linked into the standalone pg_filedump. At least that is certainly not the intention.
Putting
#undef sprintf
#undef print
after the includes in pg_filedump fixes the mac compile and imho all builds where the USE_REPL_SNPRINTF is defined as a side effect of include postgres.h effectively taking printf from me.
Not sure how to deal with this issue correctly so this is just for your consideration since the issue is a bit broader imho.
Regards,
Stepan
Am 31.08.2014 um 17:25 schrieb Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
> Em domingo, 31 de agosto de 2014, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> escreveu:
> Re: Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-06-25 <CAFcNs+oAb8h-0w2vLEWj6R-Gv=xizgdBya3K=SCd_9Tjyo=Zmw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Would like that, but I'm not sure what pgindent will do with the //
> > > comments. It's been on my to-do list to switch all the comments to C89
> > > style and then pgindent it, but I don't see myself getting to that in this
> > > decade :-(
> > >
> >
> > I changed all // comments to /* */ and run pgindent.
>
> I've pushed these patches to the git repository, thanks.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello
>
>
> --
> Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
> >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
> >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
> >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
> >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
>