| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
|---|
| From: | "eamanuel" <eamanuel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | BUG #6215: ODBC - ovelflow with the OIDs - Large Objects |
| Date: | 2011-09-20 13:13:21 |
| Message-ID: | 201109201313.p8KDDLtq054709@wwwmaster.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6215
Logged by: eamanuel
Email address: eamanuel(at)gmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 8.4
Operating system: Opernsuse 11.3
Description: ODBC - ovelflow with the OIDs - Large Objects
Details:
Hello my name is Manuel and I've a problem when in de DB the OIDs's values
are upper than 2147483647 (integer max values), but the ODBC 8.04.02 don't
support values uppers than 2147483647 but in the DB it is allowed . The
field support because it is a oid type.
Any suggestion?
Thanks
| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | eamanuel <eamanuel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #6215: ODBC - ovelflow with the OIDs - Large Objects |
| Date: | 2011-10-19 12:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZzyTMJuqRnmSCgNJOdJfJQt3Oh7SZevS_761YPPj12Eg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:13 AM, eamanuel <eamanuel(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 6215
> Logged by: eamanuel
> Email address: eamanuel(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4
> Operating system: Opernsuse 11.3
> Description: ODBC - ovelflow with the OIDs - Large Objects
> Details:
>
> Hello my name is Manuel and I've a problem when in de DB the OIDs's values
> are upper than 2147483647 (integer max values), but the ODBC 8.04.02 don't
> support values uppers than 2147483647 but in the DB it is allowed . The
> field support because it is a oid type.
> Any suggestion?
> Thanks
I haven't seen any replies to this; you might want to try on the
pgsql-odbc mailing list, as this list is for bugs in the core
distribution.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company