Re: Old postgresql repository

When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary

I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.

Comments?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary
>
> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.
>
> Comments?

OK by me. Thanks for holding off.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:31:53PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary
>
> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.
>
> Comments?

"...Linus will know his own" ;)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 16:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary
>
> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.

That's OK with me.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 17:59, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> When we did the migration to git, we decided to leave the old
>> postgresql git repository around "for a while", for people who had
>> clones around it. This is the repository that was live updated from
>> cvs while we were using cvs, and does *not* correspond to the current
>> git repository when it comes to hashes and other details. It's
>> available at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql-old.git;a=summary
>>
>> I think it's time to drop this repository now. Anybody who had active
>> clones on it should've moved to the new repository by now, I think.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> OK by me.  Thanks for holding off.

Dropped, will be gone on the next resync.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/