Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-01-21 01:22:10
Message-ID: 497678C2.2070100@obviously.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
environment variable supported by libpq.

It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.

This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgdump_man.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-01-21 02:37:52
Message-ID: 200901202137.52604.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 20 January 2009 20:22:10 Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
> pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
> environment variable supported by libpq.
>
> It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.
>
> This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.

s/varriable/variable/g

also, I forget which way is proper, but you're inconsistent with your closing
tags for <application> in that paragraph (using both </application and </>)

--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com


From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-01-21 02:41:24
Message-ID: 20090121024124.GK3940@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat wrote:

> also, I forget which way is proper, but you're inconsistent with your closing
> tags for <application> in that paragraph (using both </application and </>)

They're both acceptable.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


From: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)
Date: 2009-01-23 21:01:36
Message-ID: 497A3030.7030005@obviously.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
-Bryce

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgsl_doc_src_sgml.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)
Date: 2009-01-23 21:50:08
Message-ID: 497A3B90.80803@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
> If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
> -Bryce

You already have.

Mind you, in the future when you're not continuing a discussion from a
code patch, you should submit doc patches to pgsql-docs. But I'm sure
Peter has seen it here.

--Josh


From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)
Date: 2009-01-23 21:55:59
Message-ID: 497A3CEF.6070507@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
> Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
> If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
>
Added to next commit fest [1].

[1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2009-First

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/


From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)
Date: 2009-01-23 22:54:02
Message-ID: 497A4A8A.706@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
>> Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
>> If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
>>
> Added to next commit fest [1].

Um, not necessary. We're still accepting new doc patches, and will
until the end of beta.

--Josh


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-02-07 14:31:50
Message-ID: 200902071431.n17EVoA06106@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
> pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
> environment variable supported by libpq.
>
> It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.
>
> This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.

Patch applied, with spelling correction already noted.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)
Date: 2009-02-07 15:24:18
Message-ID: 200902071524.n17FOIp25526@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> > Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
> >> Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
> >> If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
> >>
> > Added to next commit fest [1].
>
> Um, not necessary. We're still accepting new doc patches, and will
> until the end of beta.

Yep, patch commited, removed from next commit fest.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


From: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-02-09 20:24:46
Message-ID: 4990910E.3070807@obviously.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Apologies. Turns out the name of the relevant setting was changed for 8.3! So a revised patch is attached.

For backing, see:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html

" Numerous changes in administrative server parameters...

stats_block_level and stats_row_level are merged into track_counts."

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Bryce Nesbitt wrote:


This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
environment variable supported by libpq.

It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.

This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.


Patch applied, with spelling correction already noted.

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 1.3 KB
pg_dump.patch text/x-diff 1.9 KB

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-02-09 20:37:46
Message-ID: 200902092037.n19Kbkj12475@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Apologies. Turns out the name of the relevant setting was changed
> for 8.3! So a revised patch is attached.
> For backing, see:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html
> " Numerous changes in administrative server parameters...
> stats_block_level and stats_row_level are merged into track_counts."
> Bryce Nesbitt wrote:

We don't want a pg_dump flag; the doc mention is good enough.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


From: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-02-10 00:38:19
Message-ID: 4990CC7B.9020105@obviously.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:


Apologies. Turns out the name of the relevant setting was changed
for 8.3! So a revised patch is attached.
For backing, see:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html
" Numerous changes in administrative server parameters...
stats_block_level and stats_row_level are merged into track_counts."
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:


We don't want a pg_dump flag; the doc mention is good enough.

Doh! Try this one instead. Postgres 8.3 changed the name of the flag mentioned in the doc.

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 1.1 KB
pg_doc_patch.patch text/x-diff 1.3 KB

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bryce Nesbitt <bryce2(at)obviously(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
Date: 2009-02-10 00:56:18
Message-ID: 200902100056.n1A0uIo28342@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> We don't want a pg_dump flag; the doc mention is good enough.
>
>
> Doh! Try this one instead. Postgres 8.3 changed the name of the
> flag mentioned in the doc.

[ Please avoid html-only email.]

OK, patch applied, but I removed the mention of pre-8.3 because this is
going only in the 8.4 docs.

Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +