| Lists: | pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches |
|---|
| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Userset logging |
| Date: | 2008-07-07 15:13:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1215443593.4051.601.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
all the other logging functions?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging |
| Date: | 2008-07-08 07:36:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1215502581.4051.674.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
>
> Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> all the other logging functions?
Patch enclosed.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch | text/x-patch | 924 bytes |
| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging |
| Date: | 2008-08-22 18:47:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200808221847.m7MIlEQ05484@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> > with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
> >
> > Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> > all the other logging functions?
>
> Patch enclosed.
Patch applied, docs updated.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +