Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | 8.2 Beta3-> RC1 upgrade |
Date: | 2006-11-30 12:07:25 |
Message-ID: | 1164888445.25542.4.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I possibly missed an e-mail in -hackers list; but for the people who
does not read this list, I was expecting an initdb warning in RC1
announcement. I got this after installing 8.2 RC1 RPMs:
FATAL: database files are incompatible with server
DETAIL: The database cluster was initialized with CATALOG_VERSION_NO
200611051, but the server was compiled with CATALOG_VERSION_NO
200611241.
HINT: It looks like you need to initdb.
Let me install the beta3 RPMs again...
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 Beta3-> RC1 upgrade |
Date: | 2006-12-01 17:36:26 |
Message-ID: | 200612010936.26612.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Devrim,
> I possibly missed an e-mail in -hackers list; but for the people who
> does not read this list, I was expecting an initdb warning in RC1
> announcement. I got this after installing 8.2 RC1 RPMs:
Hmmmm ... I thought that anyone using a beta knew that they would need to
initdb between each beta release. But it doesn't hurt to remind people,
you're right ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From: | "Thomas H(dot)" <me(at)alternize(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 Beta3-> RC1 upgrade |
Date: | 2006-12-01 17:54:36 |
Message-ID: | 0bc501c71571$c4a7af80$0201a8c0@iwing |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hmmmm ... I thought that anyone using a beta knew that they would need to
> initdb between each beta release. But it doesn't hurt to remind people,
> you're right ...
b1 -> b2 -> b3 didn't need an initdb... so most probably don't expect b3 ->
rc1 to need an initdb if they didn't follow discussions in hackers.
- thomas
From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 Beta3-> RC1 upgrade |
Date: | 2006-12-01 17:57:24 |
Message-ID: | 20061201175724.GF31101@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Devrim,
>
> > I possibly missed an e-mail in -hackers list; but for the people who
> > does not read this list, I was expecting an initdb warning in RC1
> > announcement. I got this after installing 8.2 RC1 RPMs:
>
> Hmmmm ... I thought that anyone using a beta knew that they would need to
> initdb between each beta release. But it doesn't hurt to remind people,
> you're right ...
Actually, it is a sort of a unwritten and sometimes-violated policy that
we _don't_ require initdb between betas. So letting them know when we
do would be "nice".
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support