| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-05 07:12:04 |
| Message-ID: | 6108.125.24.5.42.1131174724.squirrel@125.24.5.42 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
Could someone "cvs remove" this old libpqxx version? Having the old code
available may still be useful, but it should not be in current checkouts!
Jeroen
| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-05 14:46:15 |
| Message-ID: | 436CC5B7.3090602@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl wrote:
>A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
>anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
>interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
>current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
>
>Could someone "cvs remove" this old libpqxx version? Having the old code
>available may still be useful, but it should not be in current checkouts!
>
>
>
>
>
Jeroen,
you informant probably needs to use the -P option for cvs checkout.
cheers
andrew
| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-07 08:14:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20051107081441.GB98826@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:46:15AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
> >anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
> >interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
> >current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
> you informant probably needs to use the -P option for cvs checkout.
Doesn't make a difference. Besides, the outdated source is there even on
a fresh checkout.
Jeroen
| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-07 13:39:24 |
| Message-ID: | 436F590C.2070105@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:46:15AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>>>A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
>>>anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
>>>interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
>>>current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>you informant probably needs to use the -P option for cvs checkout.
>>
>>
>
>Doesn't make a difference. Besides, the outdated source is there even on
>a fresh checkout.
>
>
>
>
>
Oh, the top level interfaces directory. I misunderstood. Why is anybody
checking that out at all? Are we keeping it for historical purposes?
cheers
andrew
| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-07 17:02:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20051107130135.X993@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:46:15AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> A libpqxx user just informed me that the anonymous CVS repository at
>>>> anoncvs.postgresql.org still contained a 2002 version of libpqxx in the
>>>> interfaces directory. I checked it out and otherwise it seems to be the
>>>> current source tree--at least I found an 8.1 version number somewhere.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>> you informant probably needs to use the -P option for cvs checkout.
>>>
>>
>> Doesn't make a difference. Besides, the outdated source is there even on
>> a fresh checkout.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> Oh, the top level interfaces directory. I misunderstood. Why is anybody
> checking that out at all? Are we keeping it for historical purposes?
Yes, since past releases did include it, so if we check out a previous
release, it needs to be able to pull those files as well ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Old interfaces directory in CVS tree? |
| Date: | 2005-11-08 04:30:58 |
| Message-ID: | 11261.203.121.164.162.1131424258.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, November 8, 2005 00:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Oh, the top level interfaces directory. I misunderstood. Why is anybody
>> checking that out at all? Are we keeping it for historical purposes?
I think the person in question was doing a regular checkout of the
mainline source tree, and found this in there.
> Yes, since past releases did include it, so if we check out a previous
> release, it needs to be able to pull those files as well ...
But 8.1 is hardly a previous release. Shouldn't this directory be in the
attic or something?
Jeroen