Re: CVS is very slow

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: CVS is very slow
Date: 2005-01-03 05:46:07
Message-ID: 200501030546.j035k7L06539@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tonight regular CVS is very slow to generate a diff. Does anyone know
why? Load average is only 2.0.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS is very slow
Date: 2005-01-03 14:16:29
Message-ID: 20050103101356.O1457@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tonight regular CVS is very slow to generate a diff. Does anyone know
> why? Load average is only 2.0.

if load avg is that low, then I'd have to say there is some network lag
somewhere ... if load avg was higher, then I'd say a flood of messages to
majordomo ... one thing to note that altho there is a flood of messages to
majordomo, it doesn't mean a flood to the lists themselves, as majordomo
itself processes 'bounce messages', keeping statistics on, and
auto-unsubscribes if appropriate ... so 10 messages to the lists could
translate into 1000 messages flooding into majordomo itself if 100 of the
recipients bounce ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664