Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-03 20:23:26 |
Message-ID: | 200411032023.iA3KNQh06247@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
found 37 messages that need review:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-03 23:28:01 |
Message-ID: | 41896981.2040102@zeut.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
>period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
>found 37 messages that need review:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
>
>I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
>
>
I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4.
It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since
a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c)
having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea.
Matthew
From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-03 23:28:59 |
Message-ID: | 200411032328.iA3NSx812069@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> >period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
> >found 37 messages that need review:
> >
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> >
> >I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
> >
> >
>
> I don't see the pg_autovacuum patch that I submitted just after beta4.
> It is my understanding that this patch would be accecpted into 8.0 since
> a) it's a contrib module, b) it's a simple and small patch, and c)
> having autovacuum be aware of the vacuum delay stuff is a good idea.
These are 8.0 patches, like from 7.4 beta.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-04 10:37:57 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.61.0411041136070.5054@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Bruce,
> I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
> found 37 messages that need review:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
I'm to submit a small patch to add missing include files plus one library
for pgxs under win32. I hope to do it on Saturday.
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-04 18:06:59 |
Message-ID: | 27095.1099591619@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
> found 37 messages that need review:
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just
work-in-progress that never got completed. I don't think you need to
hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply.
regards, tom lane
From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-8.0 outstanding patches |
Date: | 2004-11-05 05:10:25 |
Message-ID: | 200411050510.iA55APU25347@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I turns out I have not been reviewing all patches kept during the beta
> > period for releases 7.2-7.4. I have gone though the kept emails and
> > found 37 messages that need review:
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches3
> > I would like to know which should be discarded and which kept for 8.1.
>
> AFAICS all of those were rejected, applied in some later form, or just
> work-in-progress that never got completed. I don't think you need to
> hold onto any of them; I certainly don't see any that look ready to apply.
Just confirming that we don't need to keep those emails that talk about:
index correlation
binary copy tools
updatable cursors
hold cursors
datacube patch
plpq for dblink
langinfo for languages-specific to_char(date)
libpq support for precision/scale
packages support
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073