Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-06 15:55:29
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AE09@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
(basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).

I don't mind bringing down all the views before I do this, it would be
just great if you could change domains from a centralized location.
Oracle offers this feature...

Merlin


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-06 16:17:38
Message-ID: 200405061617.i46GHci02356@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
> (basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).
>
> I don't mind bringing down all the views before I do this, it would be
> just great if you could change domains from a centralized location.
> Oracle offers this feature...

Interesting --- you would have to rebuild every table that uses the
domain, and map from-to for all stored values of the domain.

TODO item?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-06 17:17:02
Message-ID: 1083863821.91282.6.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
> > (basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).
>
> Interesting --- you would have to rebuild every table that uses the
> domain, and map from-to for all stored values of the domain.
>
> TODO item?

Yes. This is something I was going to look at doing in the next release.


From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-06 17:46:16
Message-ID: 409A79E8.30106@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>
>>Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
>>(basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).
>>
>>I don't mind bringing down all the views before I do this, it would be
>>just great if you could change domains from a centralized location.
>>Oracle offers this feature...
>>
>>
>
>Interesting --- you would have to rebuild every table that uses the
>domain, and map from-to for all stored values of the domain.
>
>TODO item?
>
>
Hm, how about ALTER TYPE then?
IMHO domains as well as types are a bit too basic to change later on.

Regards,
Andreas


From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-07 00:39:28
Message-ID: 409ADAC0.6010904@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
> (basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).

I was _just_ about to ask that!

Chris


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alter table alter columns vs. domains
Date: 2004-05-20 02:07:49
Message-ID: 200405200207.i4K27ow13699@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO:

o Add ALTER DOMAIN TYPE

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rod Taylor wrote:
> > > Is it feasible or practical to consider adding ALTER DOMAIN TYPE type?
> > > (basically following the same rules as ALTER TABLE).
> >
> > Interesting --- you would have to rebuild every table that uses the
> > domain, and map from-to for all stored values of the domain.
> >
> > TODO item?
>
> Yes. This is something I was going to look at doing in the next release.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073