7.4.2 branding

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: 7.4.2 branding
Date: 2004-03-04 03:11:11
Message-ID: 200403040311.i243BBn14251@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4.2 branding
Date: 2004-03-04 04:54:04
Message-ID: 200403032354.05005.matthew@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:11 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.

Ack.... is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow problem with
pg_autovacuum? I'll send a patch to the patches list shortly, hopefully it
will get included.

Matthew


From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4.2 branding
Date: 2004-03-04 04:55:17
Message-ID: 20040304005457.P23774@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.

Just as a reminder, before ppl panic ... we are aiming for Monday for a
7.4.2 release ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4.2 branding
Date: 2004-03-04 05:04:00
Message-ID: 21536.1078376640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> Ack.... is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow
> problem with pg_autovacuum?

No; we're not planning to wrap 7.4.2 till (probably) Sunday. If you can
get the patch in within the next day or so, we can include it.

I thought we'd fixed that problem already though. Is there another?

regards, tom lane


From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4.2 branding
Date: 2004-03-04 06:37:14
Message-ID: 200403040137.14217.matthew@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 04 March 2004 12:04 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought we'd fixed that problem already though. Is there another?

Don't know if it's another, but the problem posted by Cott Lang on 1/17
( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-01/msg00111.php )
has not been resolved. pg_autovacuum.c was last updated on 1/8.

In the referenced email, he included a fix that was working him, but in your
follow up email, you suggested that there were more changes required. I have
tried to follow your recommendations, but I'm not sure everything is done
right. I'm going to submit my patch to the patches list shortly.

Matthew