Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

Lists: pgsql-patches
From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-04 17:40:47
Message-ID: 20031204174047.GS9190@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

Folks,

'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

Attachment Content-Type Size
func_unixtimestamp.patch text/plain 1.6 KB

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-04 21:21:46
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0312042221120.22753-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

David Fetter writes:

> Folks,
>
> 'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
>
> Cheers,
> D

Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts and
creates valid DocBook?


From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-05 00:28:53
Message-ID: 20031205002853.GZ9190@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:21:46PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > 'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > D
>
> Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts
> and creates valid DocBook?

OK. How do I test this? After "make && make check" at the top level,
there is no html or pdf.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778


From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-05 00:39:06
Message-ID: 3FCFD3AA.3020303@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

David Fetter wrote:
> OK. How do I test this? After "make && make check" at the top level,
> there is no html or pdf.
>

first do:
cd doc/src/sgml

See:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/docguide-build.html

HTH,

Joe


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-16 01:13:30
Message-ID: 200312160113.hBG1DUS16709@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches


Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
>
> Cheers,
> D
> --
> David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-16 09:01:34
Message-ID: 32848.137.226.116.18.1071565294.squirrel@new.host.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
> parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?

That's what I said, that's what I meant.


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-17 01:05:48
Message-ID: 200312170105.hBH15m424434@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
> > parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
>
> That's what I said, that's what I meant.

Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not telling
me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find out where the
SGML build fails.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-17 07:00:03
Message-ID: 200312170800.03622.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the
> > > relivant parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
> >
> > That's what I said, that's what I meant.
>
> Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not
> telling me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find
> out where the SGML build fails.

This patch is already taken care of.


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-17 07:07:03
Message-ID: 200312170707.hBH773Q08948@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches


Applied by Peter.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
>
> Cheers,
> D
> --
> David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073