Re: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?

Lists: pgsql-sql
From: teknokrat <teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?
Date: 2003-09-25 17:04:23
Message-ID: bkv76m$h4f$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

If I have several selects joined with unions does postgresql execute the
concurrently or not?

thanks


From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com
Subject: Re: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?
Date: 2003-09-26 19:58:59
Message-ID: 3F749A83.30001@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

teknokrat wrote:

> If I have several selects joined with unions does postgresql execute the
> concurrently or not?

nope.

Regards
Gaetan Mendola


From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?
Date: 2003-09-26 20:28:23
Message-ID: 604qyz2t20.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com (Gaetano Mendola) writes:
> teknokrat wrote:
>> If I have several selects joined with unions does postgresql
>> execute the concurrently or not?
>
> nope.

I was talking with Jan about that very idea yesterday; this would seem
to be the place where PostgreSQL might take some (possibly even nearly
magical :-)) benefit from threading.

The usual way that people expect to use threading is for each
connection to have a thread.

If, instead, every _join_ had a thread, that would allow producers of
data to look for their data quasi-independently, passing result sets
upwards towards the return set to whatever thread was waiting to
consume the data.

This would allow one complex query to take over a whole horde of
processors :-).

The "magic" part would be if the system decided, "The SEQ SCAN on the
table I'm looking at is a big one; let's split it into 4 chunks, doing
a virtual UNION ALL, and thereby filter bits of it in parallel on 4
CPUs." That would provide many of the benefits Informix claimed from
"fragmentation" without having to fragment the table :-).
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/lsf.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #187. "I will not hold lavish banquets in
the middle of a famine. The good PR among the guests doesn't make up
for the bad PR among the masses." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: teknokrat(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?
Date: 2003-09-29 17:54:48
Message-ID: 200309291754.h8THsmK08178@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-sql

teknokrat wrote:
> If I have several selects joined with unions does postgresql execute the
> concurrently or not?

No.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073