Re: vacuum warnings with pgsql 7.3.3

Lists: pgsql-admin
From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: vacuum warnings with pgsql 7.3.3
Date: 2003-07-05 05:34:48
Message-ID: 200307051104.48804.mallah@trade-india.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-admin


Hi,

These warnings still come under some mysterious
circumstances with PostgreSQL 7.3.3 .

is it worth investigating , if yes i will try to
get more details . If no i will ignore it for the
time being.

Regds
Mallah.

WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 1 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 2 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 3 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 4 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 5 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 6 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 7 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 8 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 9 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 10 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 11 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 12 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 13 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 14 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 15 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 16 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 17 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 18 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 19 - fixing
WARNING: Rel site_search: Uninitialized page 20 - fixing
--
Rajesh Kumar Mallah,
Project Manager (Development)
Infocom Network Limited, New Delhi
phone: +91(11)6152172 (221) (L) ,9811255597 (M)

Visit http://www.trade-india.com ,
India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum warnings with pgsql 7.3.3
Date: 2003-07-05 13:46:34
Message-ID: 3970.1057412794@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-admin

Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> writes:
> These warnings still come under some mysterious
> circumstances with PostgreSQL 7.3.3 .

> is it worth investigating ,

Yes.

regards, tom lane


From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum warnings with pgsql 7.3.3
Date: 2003-07-17 07:35:53
Message-ID: 200307171305.53516.mallah@trade-india.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Saturday 05 Jul 2003 7:16 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> writes:
> > These warnings still come under some mysterious
> > circumstances with PostgreSQL 7.3.3 .
> >
> > is it worth investigating ,
>
> Yes.

It is the same problem , and below is the reply you gave
few months back i think

=================================================================

<mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm i do the below daily to this table. And this is pgsql 7.3
> TRUNCATE TABLE public.site_search;

Drat. Now that I look at it, 7.3 TRUNCATE doesn't send any kind of
relcache inval message, so it's got the same kind of problem that the
nailed-in-cache catalogs do: other backends don't reset their
which-page-to-insert-on pointer.

This is already fixed for 7.4, because in 7.4 TRUNCATE updates the
pg_class entry.

We decided not to backpatch any fix for the system-catalog version
of the problem, because it is purely cosmetic (there is no problem
other than the warning messages). So I guess I think the same about
this version of the problem.

regards, tom lane

======================================================================

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html