Re: PostGres and WIN32, a plea!

Lists: pgsql-hackers
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
Date: 2002-11-26 15:43:20
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128C76@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:merlin(at)rcsonline(dot)com]
> Sent: 22 November 2002 21:25
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
>
>
> I had read on one of the newsgroups that there is a planned
> native port to the win32 platform, is this true? I read most
> of the win32 thread off of the dev site and it was not clear
> if this was true.

Hi Merlin,

This is true - the port is being actively worked on (see recent posts
from Bruce Momjian). A number of us have also been involved with the
closed source beta testing recently.

> I think postgres is the fastest
> database ever written for pc hardware, with the one possible
> exception of Microsoft Foxpro (note: not written by
> Microsoft).

Hmm, ever tried using a large multiuser database such as a finance
system using a Foxpro database? Network managers have been known to
murder for less... :-)

Regards, Dave.


From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
Date: 2002-11-26 18:27:10
Message-ID: 200211261827.gAQIRAk27431@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:merlin(at)rcsonline(dot)com]
> > Sent: 22 November 2002 21:25
> > To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: [HACKERS] PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
> >
> >
> > I had read on one of the newsgroups that there is a planned
> > native port to the win32 platform, is this true? I read most
> > of the win32 thread off of the dev site and it was not clear
> > if this was true.
>
> Hi Merlin,
>
> This is true - the port is being actively worked on (see recent posts
> from Bruce Momjian). A number of us have also been involved with the
> closed source beta testing recently.

Yes, I expect the 7.4 release, due in mid-2003, to have a native Win32
port.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073


From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostGres and WIN32, a plea!
Date: 2002-11-27 14:04:49
Message-ID: as2j7v$199d$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Hmm, ever tried using a large multiuser database such as a finance
> system using a Foxpro database? Network managers have been known to
> murder for less... :-)
>
Hmm, I have, and you could imagine the result :)
It was a small system, really and everything was fine until I added my 10th
user. Then my data left me like the parting of the Red Sea :).

Building a database system on lousy tehnology, only to rewrite it is
something all database admins have to go through. I think its kind of like
coming of age. On the unix side of things, you have mysql catching people
the same way.

FP did have a very nice query optimizer. Also, FP views optimized the where
condition through the query, and have for quite some time (does PG do this
yet?). I think the FP team was really on to something, till M hamstrung the
project.

FP also had the ability to write user defined functions into the query,
something I thought I would have to give up forever, until I stumbled across
PG (from the mysql docs, go figure!)

Merlin