Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement

Lists: pgsql-advocacy
From: "Derek Barrett" <derekbarrett(at)graffiti(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
Date: 2002-10-28 23:16:22
Message-ID: 20021028231622.13095.qmail@graffiti.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Well, I do agree with Postgres being older and more
established, but as far as name recognition goes,
I would put SAP as being ahead in that category
by a wide margin.

Their free db also has built in replication.

----- Original Message -----
From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:58:09 -0700
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement

> Derek,
>
> > One interesting thing that I want to add to this
> > discussion, which I'm sure some of you have heard,
> > and probably already mentioned, is that SAP released
> > a free version of its database, called SAPDB.
> > Now, when I think of "ultra enterprise level software"
> > I think of SAP. Perhaps making one of those comparison
> > charts and including SAPDB in there, we can piggyback
> > on their name and use it to our advantage.
>
> I know about SAPDB -- nice folks. However, as we are the older and
> better-established project, I don't think we need to "piggyback on their
> name"; if anything, the other way around.
>
> --
> -Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>

--
_______________________________________________
Get your free email from http://www.graffiti.net

Powered by Outblaze


From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Derek Barrett" <derekbarrett(at)graffiti(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
Date: 2002-10-28 23:30:17
Message-ID: 200210281530.17174.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Derek,

> Well, I do agree with Postgres being older and more
> established, but as far as name recognition goes,
> I would put SAP as being ahead in that category
> by a wide margin.

SAP is well-known; SAP DB is not. I try to mention it whenever I list off OS
databases (along with Phoenix) because nobody seems to have heard of it, and
it's a natural for Oracle migrators.

> Their free db also has built in replication.

Yeah. I wish we could use their implementation, but the back-end
architectures are radically different.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco