Bug in ODBC driver

Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-odbc
From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Bug in ODBC driver
Date: 2001-04-30 13:05:36
Message-ID: 200104301305.IAA01829@jupiter.jw.home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Guys,

while analyzing some stuff I came across something that looks
like a bug in the ODBC driver to me. I'm by far not the ODBC
user I should be to fix it, so could someone else please take
another look?

The symptom is when the driver is in AUTOCOMMIT=OFF, closing
the last used curser issues an END, thereby committing the
transaction. It happens in odbc/qresult.c line 320 and the
code looks pretty much like ignoring the autocommit flag.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ODBC driver
Date: 2001-04-30 23:56:49
Message-ID: 3AEDFBC1.AE324E0B@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> while analyzing some stuff I came across something that looks
> like a bug in the ODBC driver to me. I'm by far not the ODBC
> user I should be to fix it, so could someone else please take
> another look?
>
> The symptom is when the driver is in AUTOCOMMIT=OFF, closing
> the last used curser issues an END, thereby committing the
> transaction. It happens in odbc/qresult.c line 320 and the
> code looks pretty much like ignoring the autocommit flag.
>

You seem to be right.
I would fix it.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue