| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | MAX Query length |
| Date: | 1999-07-14 07:48:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED02B@S-NATH-EXCH2 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Trawling through the code last night I noticed that:
#define MAX_QUERY_SIZE (BLCKSZ * 2)
Is there any conceivable reason why the query length would be dependent on
the block size? Or do I just have old source code?
MikeA
| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] MAX Query length |
| Date: | 1999-07-14 15:02:23 |
| Message-ID: | 199907141502.LAA22817@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
> Trawling through the code last night I noticed that:
> #define MAX_QUERY_SIZE (BLCKSZ * 2)
>
> Is there any conceivable reason why the query length would be dependent on
> the block size? Or do I just have old source code?
No great reason, but is seems like a good maximum. This controls the
buffer size on the client and server. Do you need it larger?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026