Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
---|
From: | fschmidt <fschmidt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Is there an interface that... |
Date: | 2008-01-24 18:18:05 |
Message-ID: | 15071374.post@talk.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Is there an interface language that:
1. Supports usual programming features like maps, sorting, etc.
2. Can return sets.
3. Supports cursors.
4. Allows function definitions to be source.
#1 eliminates PL/pgSQL.
#2 eliminates PL/Tcl
#3 eliminates PL/Python
#4 eliminates PL/Java
I didn't look at Perl because I don't like Perl (just my personal
preference).
Any suggestions?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-an-interface-that...-tp15071374p15071374.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - interfaces mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | fschmidt <fschmidt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there an interface that... |
Date: | 2008-01-29 09:46:46 |
Message-ID: | 479EF606.4050100@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi,
fschmidt wrote:
> 1. Supports usual programming features like maps, sorting, etc.
> 2. Can return sets.
> 3. Supports cursors.
> 4. Allows function definitions to be source.
>
> #1 eliminates PL/pgSQL.
> #2 eliminates PL/Tcl
> #3 eliminates PL/Python
> #4 eliminates PL/Java
Uh.. no PL "eliminates" any other PL for most values of "elimination" I
know of. What exactly is it you want, here?
> I didn't look at Perl because I don't like Perl (just my personal
> preference).
Well, what language *do* you like?
Regards
Markus