Lists: | pgsql-performance |
---|
From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: insert performance for win32 |
Date: | 2005-11-04 15:31:11 |
Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD7CB@Herge.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> That's bizarre ... I'd have thought a very long line would be more
> likely to trigger internal performance problems than the original.
>
> What happens if you read the file with "psql -f dump.sql" instead
> of cat/stdin?
non-flat. Also ran via \i and got non flat times.
> BTW, I get flat times for your psql test case on Unix, again both with
> local and remote client. So whatever is going on here, it's
> Windows-specific.
yeah. I'm guessing problem is in the mingw flex/bison (which I really,
really hope is not the case) or some other win32 specific block of code.
I'm snooping around there...
Merlin
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: insert performance for win32 |
Date: | 2005-11-04 15:36:34 |
Message-ID: | 13861.1131118594@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> yeah. I'm guessing problem is in the mingw flex/bison (which I really,
> really hope is not the case) or some other win32 specific block of code.
> I'm snooping around there...
Maybe I'm confused here, but I thought we had established that the local
and remote cases behave differently for you? If so I'd suppose that it
must be a networking issue, and there's little point in looking inside
psql.
If the problem is internal to psql, gprof or similar tool would be
helpful ... got anything like that on Windows?
regards, tom lane