Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
---|
From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | missing rename support |
Date: | 2011-12-03 21:46:21 |
Message-ID: | 1322948781.26266.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed the following object types don't have support for an ALTER ...
RENAME command:
DOMAIN (but ALTER TYPE works)
FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER
OPERATOR
RULE
SERVER
Are there any restrictions why these couldn't be added?
(I stumbled upon this while trying to rename a foreign server, but we
might as well make everything consistent.)
From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: missing rename support |
Date: | 2011-12-05 15:44:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ12OYdYkH-jn_oC-Mzh9FQbBQHg=ENsUWp4aPjpD1E_Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I noticed the following object types don't have support for an ALTER ...
> RENAME command:
>
> DOMAIN (but ALTER TYPE works)
> FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER
> OPERATOR
> RULE
> SERVER
>
> Are there any restrictions why these couldn't be added?
I don't think so. There's no ALTER RULE command; should we add one
(matching ALTER TRIGGER) or make this part of ALTER TABLE? I don't
think constraints can be renamed either, which should probably be
addressed along with rules.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: missing rename support |
Date: | 2011-12-05 15:54:31 |
Message-ID: | 28134.1323100471@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think so. There's no ALTER RULE command; should we add one
> (matching ALTER TRIGGER) or make this part of ALTER TABLE? I don't
> think constraints can be renamed either, which should probably be
> addressed along with rules.
Note that renaming an index-based constraint should also rename the
index. I believe the other direction works already.
regards, tom lane