multiple out parameters implementation

I've managed to hack into the jdbc driver the capability for multiple
out parameters from a postgresql function. Before you say no it can't be
done, read on.

Also before anyone gives me credit for the idea, the original work was
provided by Fujitsu japan, I can only take credit for implementing it in
the current driver.

The way this works is:

1) create a composite type eg:
create type Numeric_Proc_RetType as(it1 numeric(30,15),it2
numeric(30,15),it3 numeric(30,15))

2) create a function which returns this type.
create function
Numeric_Proc(numeric(30,15),numeric(30,15),numeric(30,15)) returns
Numeric_Proc_RetType as
'declare work_ret record; begin select * into work_ret from
Numeric_Tab; return work_ret; end;'
language 'plpgsql'

3)create a table

create temp table numeric_tab (MAX_VAL NUMERIC(30,15), MIN_VAL
NUMERIC(30,15), NULL_VAL NUMERIC(30,15) )

Then the following code now works:

CallableStatement call = con.prepareCall( func + "Numeric_Proc(?,?,?) }"
) ;

call.registerOutParameter(1,Types.NUMERIC);
call.registerOutParameter(2,Types.NUMERIC);
call.registerOutParameter(3,Types.NUMERIC);

call.setBigDecimal(2,new java.math.BigDecimal(1));
call.setBigDecimal(3,new java.math.BigDecimal(2));
call.setBigDecimal(4,new java.math.BigDecimal(3));

call.execute();
java.math.BigDecimal ret = call.getBigDecimal(1);
ret = call.getBigDecimal(2);
ret = call.getBigDecimal(3);

There is more work to be done, but I've found it relatively easy to do,
thanks largely to Oliver's rewrite of the code (Thanks Oliver!).

This is particularly useful to folks that want to port code from other
databases which do support multiple out parameters.

I would like to query the list as to their thoughts, is this a useful
feature for the driver ?

Dave

--
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561
www.postgresintl.com

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Dave Cramer wrote:

> I've managed to hack into the jdbc driver the capability for multiple
> out parameters from a postgresql function.
>
> I would like to query the list as to their thoughts, is this a useful
> feature for the driver ?
>

This is a useful feature because it's currently the only way to port
certain things, but it's clearly not very straightforward and it causes
some non trivial thinking on the parts of the database and Java developers
to get their code to match up.

Until just today I was in favor of this as we don't have any other options
or any hope for a real procedure interface in the near future, but today
on -hackers Gavin Sherry and Neil Conway indicated that they have a
proposal for implementing this feature in the backend. I'd say lets take
a look at the proposal and if we believe they've got a decent shot at
getting this in 8.1 then we hold off on this hack. The method you
proposed is pretty complicated and would introduce a pretty bad backwards
compatibility problem.

Kris Jurka