| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
|---|
| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Patch needed fot dt.h |
| Date: | 2007-05-21 07:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | 46514DBC.1090801@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Hi all,
With latest modification on src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/dt_common.c,
DTK_ISODOW is not defined. The patch attached needs to be applied on 8.1
and 8.2 branches to compile successfully.
Regards.
--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| dt_h.patch | text/x-patch | 4.0 KB |
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org (Michael Meskes) |
| Subject: | Re: Patch needed fot dt.h |
| Date: | 2007-05-21 14:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | 10457.1179757050@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> writes:
> With latest modification on src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/dt_common.c,
> DTK_ISODOW is not defined. The patch attached needs to be applied on 8.1
> and 8.2 branches to compile successfully.
I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
DTK_ISODOW in the first place. That looks more like a copy&paste
error than something intentional. Michael?
regards, tom lane
| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch needed fot dt.h |
| Date: | 2007-05-21 14:58:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20070521145829.GA9126@feivel.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:17:30AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm wondering why the back-branch patches added a dependency on
> DTK_ISODOW in the first place. That looks more like a copy&paste
> error than something intentional. Michael?
It is, somehow it slipped through. Just removed it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!