Re: PS: Timeout (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the postmaster service to connect.

I forgot to mention that when I go into the service manager, I am able to start the service manually, but it apparantly won't start on its own when the machine starts up (yes, it is set to automatic start).

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Russell

Russell,

On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:18:24PM -0600, Russell Black wrote:
> I forgot to mention that when I go into the service manager, I am able to
> start the service manually, but it apparantly won't start on its own when
> the machine starts up(yes, it is set to automatic start).
>
> Any ideas?

I suggest reading the following Cygwin mailing list thread in its
entirety:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-10/msg01258.html

The above seems to be the solution to your problem. Please report back
to the list as to whether or not it works for you.

Thanks,
Jason

Thank you!!!!

This worked.

I just added tcpip and LanmanWorkstation as dependencies, as below:

cygrunsrv --install postmaster --path /usr/bin/postmaster --args "-i" --dep
ipc-daemon --dep LanmanWorkstation --dep tcpip --termsig INT --user
administrator --shutdown

There seemed to be some confusion over which service to depend upon, so I
depended on both. Again, thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

Russell

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Tishler" <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: "Russell Black" <rblack(at)iarchives(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] PS: Timeout (30000 milliseconds) waiting for the
postmaster service to connect.

> Russell,
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 12:18:24PM -0600, Russell Black wrote:
> > I forgot to mention that when I go into the service manager, I am able
to
> > start the service manually, but it apparantly won't start on its own
when
> > the machine starts up(yes, it is set to automatic start).
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> I suggest reading the following Cygwin mailing list thread in its
> entirety:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-10/msg01258.html
>
> The above seems to be the solution to your problem. Please report back
> to the list as to whether or not it works for you.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason

Russell,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 07:16:03PM -0600, Russell Black wrote:
> Thank you!!!!

You are welcome.

> This worked.

Great.

> There seemed to be some confusion over which service to depend upon, so I
> depended on both.

Which is why I used the word entirety...

Jason