Lists: | pgsql-patches |
---|
From: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Fix for compiler warnings on MSVC |
Date: | 2008-02-19 10:25:14 |
Message-ID: | 003101c872e1$b767f270$0a01a8c0@gevmus |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
this is a fix for the compiler warnings on MSVC due differences in
declaration and implementation of _yconv in strfime.c.
I have testing this patch on:
- MSVC 8
- gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Regards,
Gevik.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
2.strftime.c.patch | application/octet-stream | 745 bytes |
From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix for compiler warnings on MSVC |
Date: | 2008-02-19 12:08:26 |
Message-ID: | 20080219120826.GG3091@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:25:14AM +0100, Gevik Babakhani wrote:
> this is a fix for the compiler warnings on MSVC due differences in
> declaration and implementation of _yconv in strfime.c.
>
> I have testing this patch on:
>
> - MSVC 8
> - gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
Argh for delays in the mailinglist delivery and my reading :-) I've just
applied one identical and one very similar patch to yours for these two
issues.
But thanks anyway :-)
//Magnus
From: | "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "'Magnus Hagander'" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix for compiler warnings on MSVC |
Date: | 2008-02-19 12:30:41 |
Message-ID: | 004b01c872f3$3e8bd530$0a01a8c0@gevmus |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> Argh for delays in the mailinglist delivery and my reading
> :-) I've just applied one identical and one very similar
> patch to yours for these two issues.
>
> But thanks anyway :-)
>
Thank you :)