Re: Recommended ODBC version for compilation

Lists: pgsql-odbc
From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recommended ODBC version for compilation
Date: 2005-11-14 20:24:44
Message-ID: 000401c5e959$78fbf5c9$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-odbc

-----Original Message-----
From: "Peter Eisentraut"<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Sent: 14/11/05 20:17:06
To: "Dave Page"<dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ODBC] Recommended ODBC version for compilation

> Apparently they are routed through the list, but I just see
>
> To: noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> From: <noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
>
> which doesn't really help my filtering rules.

Well that's down to gforge I'm afraid. Perhaps one of the pgfoundry guys can improve that. The other option is Yet Another Mailing List, but that won't help keep things in one place for ppl searching the archives which I think is important.

Regards, Dave

-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Dave Page wrote:
> It should send them to the list, not to you specifically. Is that not
> the case?

Apparently they are routed through the list, but I just see

To: noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
From: <noreply(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>

which doesn't really help my filtering rules.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/