| From: | Noel <nobody(at)nowhere(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Image storage questions |
| Date: | 2005-05-18 22:49:24 |
| Message-ID: | efhn81942f62e7sah0gtr52b0eiqf1dpip@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 18 May 2005 14:07:18 -0700, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D.
Drake") wrote:
>Large Objects stream (for lack of a better term) to the client in 8k?
>chunks so it typically isn't too bad.
>Bytea gives you everything all at once which is fine for small objects.
Isn't there also a difference between the two in terms of the largest
amount of data they can handle?
>External storing is useful but I prefer LO because all my data (binary
>and meta) is all in the same place for management.
As well as ensuring data integrity, of course.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoffrey | 2005-05-19 01:20:19 | Re: Newbie question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-18 21:53:08 | Re: numeric precision when raising one numeric to another. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-05-18 23:06:35 | Re: Two-phase commit issues |
| Previous Message | Joe Chang | 2005-05-18 22:43:20 | Re: Two-phase commit issues |