Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date: 2008-09-08 14:15:14
Message-ID: efd7a2a239337acbe33ae74b8b92dd31@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Tom Lane wrote:
> My vote is to reject the patch and work on a config checker.

+1

> postgres=# set work_mem = '1g';
> ERROR: invalid value for parameter "work_mem": "1g"

Perhaps this would be a great place for a HINT listing all
valid inputs, if not there already?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809081014
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkjFM2AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiDvACdE6Wlrnu3uQH4mOpuEMvX0VQe
rXoAoPLCR5jKTWQH4GsHDtz5NNZXq4vA
=nRMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-09-08 14:17:56 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-08 14:10:44 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code