| From: | Matthew Terenzio <matt(at)jobsforge(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-09 03:59:35 |
| Message-ID: | e58fbeb03354e45f7d7b863eab5e3afa@jobsforge.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Oct 8, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Uwe C. Schroeder wrote:
> Didn't MySQL AB acquire SAPdb (which was Adabas D before)? AFAIK (and
> you're
> welcome to correct me since I might very well be wrong) SAPdb supports
> transactions and foreign keys. If that's the case MySQL AB might be
> in a
> position to offer the bells and whistles without InnoDB support if
> they work
> out the deficiencies of SAPdb.
Or maybe SQLite?
I was looking for some other options and saw this page. It look like
the author mistakenly calls PostgreSQL GPL'd.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-10-09 04:07:08 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-09 03:59:04 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-10-09 04:07:08 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-09 03:59:04 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |