| From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |
| Date: | 2009-04-15 18:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | e51f66da0904151106v7a3a812bh1c364345243bc191@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/15/09, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Wouldn't we just then say that U&'' strings are always standard-
> >> conforming?
> >
> > That's exactly what's causing the problem --- they are, but there
> > is lots of software that won't know it.
>
> We could say U&'' escapes only work if you have
> standards_conforming_strings set to true.
Whats wrong with requiring U& to conform with stdstr=off quoting rules?
You can use UESCAPE if you dont want to double backslashes.
--
marko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Poul-Henning Kamp | 2009-04-15 18:21:38 | Lawyer jokes... |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-04-15 17:57:22 | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |