Re: Slow first query despite LIMIT and OFFSET clause

From: Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow first query despite LIMIT and OFFSET clause
Date: 2009-01-26 07:06:00
Message-ID: e373d31e0901252306r166acacbn7264bff14b8b130e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi Scott. Yes, there is an autovacuum on both the tables. Should i
>> additionally do a manual vacuum too?
>
> Nah, just an analyze. what version of pgsql is this, btw?
>

Actually both vacuum and analyze happen at regular intervals. Are they
not doing their job?

PG 8.2.9

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-01-26 07:07:35 Re: Slow first query despite LIMIT and OFFSET clause
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-01-26 07:04:26 Re: Slow first query despite LIMIT and OFFSET clause