Its an int4.
Charlie
Tom Lane wrote:
> Charlie Savage <cfis(at)interserv(dot)com> writes:
>> Thus the time decreased from 8486 seconds to 5279 seconds - which is a
>> nice improvement. However, that still leaves postgresql about 9 times
>> slower.
>
> BTW, what data type are you sorting, exactly? If it's a string type,
> what is your LC_COLLATE setting?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>