Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date: 2007-11-12 17:31:59
Message-ID: dcc563d10711120931s641b0dfew85b1cba175694535@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 12, 2007 11:29 AM, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:14:46AM -0700, Steve Wampler wrote:
> > Also, what kernel are you using with CentOS 5 - a 32-bit (with hugemem
> > to support the 8GB) or a 64-bit? And which was PostgreSQL compiled for?
>
> You don't need a 32bit kernel to support 8GB of memory should you? As
> long as the kernel supports PAE that should be enough to make use of it.
> You only need a 64bit address space when each process wants to see more
> than ~3GB of RAM.

There's a performance hit for using PAE. Not sure what it is, but I
recall it being the in the 5 to 10% range.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2007-11-12 17:37:20 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Previous Message Sam Mason 2007-11-12 17:29:37 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance