Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state

From: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state
Date: 2010-01-02 00:27:39
Message-ID: dc7b844e1001011627r70b65edexad3cd4ee1eff7806@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I would recommend we make SIGINT do cancel-anything, and handle
> everything else via SIGUSR1, including CancelRequest. I'm not going to
> do that; I'm going to make HS conflict resolution work, which means
> putting in enough infrastructure to allow someone else to make SIGINT
> changes work at a later time, if appropriate.

If this is the final consent then please go ahead with HS and I will
see if I can take care of the rest.

Joachim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-01-02 01:20:12 Re: Change to config.pl processing in the msvc build environment
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-01 22:50:18 Re: PATCH: Add hstore_to_json()