Re: Logical replication in the same cluster

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication in the same cluster
Date: 2017-05-02 02:14:20
Message-ID: dba44a22-be96-b495-7b2e-f7ed6c7bfaac@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/30/17 20:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-04-26 23:41:51 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Yes that's result of how logical replication slots work, the transaction
>> that needs to finish is your transaction. It can be worked around by
>> creating the slot manually via the SQL interface for example and create
>> the subscription using WITH (NOCREATE SLOT, SLOT NAME = 'your slot') .
>
> Is there any chance the creation of the slot could be moved ahead, to
> before an xid has been assigned?

The trend has rather been to do most of the stuff before creating the
slot, so that all the error checking is done. See for example
dcb39c37c1d3b90115e1501af8efb7af59c341c3.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-05-02 02:24:56 Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-05-02 02:10:36 Re: Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression