| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Notify enhancement |
| Date: | 2006-12-04 00:06:04 |
| Message-ID: | db4f5148253808f785ddbebd20425b6c@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane asked:
> What "relation constraint"? They can be any identifier you want.
To clarify, it would be nice to use any arbitrary string (perhaps up
to NAMEDATALEN), rather than bumping into the rules for valid identifiers:
LISTEN notify.name.like.this;
LISTEN table.mutation;
It would also make things like this act more intuitively:
LISTEN nosuchschema.abc;
NOTIFY foo.bar.abc;
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200612031856
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFc2WSvJuQZxSWSsgRAkQOAJ93c1ZiTx9h9Bho0YLpFmNwrRHVzACgp/tl
hi1sQRbEcFRpMNNbQQ7xnhM=
=LAI2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-12-04 00:36:49 | Re: Notify enhancement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-03 23:34:27 | Re: Notify enhancement |