From: | "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Michael Meskes" <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connection string |
Date: | 2006-08-12 03:40:53 |
Message-ID: | d86a77ef0608112040h34495423hd94f0eb54f0d07b3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
What kind of patch are you talking about?
On 8/11/06, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:09:16PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:01:55AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > > The ECPG "Connecting to the Database Server" documentation does
> > > have an example for Unix sockets with quotes:
> > >
> > > EXEC SQL CONNECT TO 'unix:postgresql://sql.mydomain.com/mydb' AS
> myconnection USER john;
> > >
> > > Should that be changed? It's wrong on two counts as far as
> >
> > I think so yes.
>
> Will you take care of it or should I submit a patch? I've noticed
> a few other discrepancies between the documentation and actual
> behavior, like examples with "VARCHAR val;" that the preprocessor
> rejects with "ERROR: pointer to varchar are not implemented."
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lee A Reum | 2006-08-12 03:45:25 | Problem with a dropped database |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-12 02:04:20 | Re: Jasper Reports |