Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables
Date: 2017-09-05 06:36:30
Message-ID: d3a3bf11-c53c-cf50-f8e2-098f1b657fda@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/09/05 15:30, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Those changes are already part of my updated 0001 patch. Aren't they?
> May be you should just review those and see if those are suitable for
> you?

Yeah, I think it's going to be the same patch, functionality-wise.

And sorry, I didn't realize you were talking about the case after applying
your patch on HEAD.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-09-05 06:41:17 Re: show "aggressive" or not in autovacuum logs
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-09-05 06:35:20 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables