Re: Idle connection timeout

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idle connection timeout
Date: 2009-10-10 12:26:54
Message-ID: bddc86150910100526t1f5914b9gdaa8a517551ae1d0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/10 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>

> Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Oh, I see. Yes, that is different. In which case, I'd still like to
> > see such a feature implemented as I imagine it could be useful for
> > auto-killing connections not being used that are continuously taking
> > some of the resources.
>
> Did you try pgbouncer yet?
> --
> dim
>

I've only been using the bare-bones Postgres setup. And you're right,
connection pooling would be a good substitute, so I'll look into setting
that up. Thanks Dimitri.

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-10 14:01:30 Re: Encoding issues in console and eventlog on win32
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-10-10 12:07:46 Re: Idle connection timeout