| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions |
| Date: | 2009-08-04 13:28:55 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150908040628u46d18772s69bcf362bd0b32aa@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM, PFC<lists(at)peufeu(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> lzo is much, much, (much) faster than zlib. Note, I've tried several
>
> decompression speed is even more awesome...
>
>> times to contact the author to get clarification on licensing terms
>> and have been unable to get a response.
>
> lzop and the LZO library are distributed under the terms of the GNU General
> Public License (GPL).
> source : http://www.lzop.org/lzop_man.php
yeah...I have another project I'm working on that is closed source,
plus I was curious if something could be worked out for pg...lzo seems
ideal for database usage. The author is MIA or too busy hacking to
answer his email :-).
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-04 13:46:33 | Re: select count(idn) is slow (Seq Scan) instead of Bitmap Heap.. why? |
| Previous Message | PFC | 2009-08-03 21:30:48 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions |